Decision
- Body: Escondido City Council
- Agenda item: Item 6 on April 15, 2026
- Planning case named in sources: PL26-0038
- Applicant named in sources: Warmington Residential
- Resolution named in agenda packet: Resolution No. 2026-55
- Request described in sources: authorization for staff to intake and process a General Plan Amendment
- Housing count described in sources: up to 126 multi-family dwelling units
- Location description in sources: northeast corner of Miller Avenue and Citracado Parkway
- Minutes-recorded action: motion approved 5-0
Review Scope
The agenda packet says the requested authorization was for processing a General Plan Amendment. It also says the merits of the development proposal would be analyzed at formal submittal and that a future proposal would have to undergo environmental review.
Those statements are important limits. This page records the authorization step; it does not summarize a formal project application, decide the merits of the proposal, publish project plans, interpret environmental review, or describe current development status.
Related local context
Reviewed pages that connect this item to nearby places, organizations, records, or topics.
Evidence and maintenance
References, source snapshots, and audit notes are kept here for readers who want to verify the page or maintain it later.
Good to know
Use this page as a sourced starting point for understanding the reviewed civic record, key source dates, and related public-decision context.
- Check a current source before relying on project approval, entitlement status, current application status, environmental-review outcome, project merits, design, construction,...
Change and source dates
- Latest page update
- 2026-06-03
- Latest source check
- 2026-05-26
- Source snapshot
- 2026-05-24T23:00:03-07:00
A newer source should be checked before changing current status, access, roles, schedules, or practical details.
References and audit trail
References
Publication Limits
This page does not publish final Resolution No. 2026-55 text, development-project approval, current application status, entitlement status, environmental-review outcome, project merits, site design, parcel boundaries, construction, implementation, later amendments, field conditions, or legal interpretation.
Check final Resolution No. 2026-55, formal application records, planning records, environmental-review records, project plans, public notices, later agendas or minutes, permit records, current City pages, and legal/current-status records before relying on project approval, entitlement status, current application status, environmental-review outcome, project merits, design, construction, implementation, legal effect, later amendments, or field conditions.
Source Notes
The agenda packet supports the Item 6 request, applicant, unit-count ceiling, broad location description, named resolution, and review-scope limits. The approved minutes support only the recorded PL26-0038 motion and 5-0 approval.
Neither source should be treated as a final resolution, formal application file, project-plan set, environmental-review record, entitlement record, construction-status record, or current project status source.