Source Details
- Publisher: City of Escondido.
- Source type: public-hearing notice PDF.
- Notice hearing date: May 20, 2026.
- Retrieved snapshot date: May 24, 2026.
- Related topic: Commissions, Agendas, and Notices.
Notice Context
The notice says the Escondido City Council would hold a continued public hearing on May 20, 2026 at 5 p.m. to consider a Conditional Use Permit modification terminating a traffic-signal installation stipulation specified in Exhibit E of City Council Resolution No. 2024-183R. The notice identifies the case as PL26-0088.
The notice also says the City Council held the initial public hearing on April 8, 2026 and voted to continue the hearing after receiving public testimony and deliberating. Use those statements only as notice-stated hearing-context text.
Request And Site Context
The notice states that the request was to modify a previously approved Conditional Use Permit, PHG19-0049, to terminate a condition requiring the project developer to pay $560,000 of the construction cost of a new traffic signal at Rock Springs Road and Lincoln Avenue. The notice says that condition was specified in Exhibit E of Resolution No. 2024-183R, adopted by the City Council on December 4, 2024.
The notice describes the previously approved Conditional Use Permit, PHG19-0049, as entitling the project site for development of a gasoline service station and convenience store with concurrent sale of beer and wine.
The notice describes the site as a 1.14-acre, two-parcel site at the northwest corner of West Mission Avenue and Rock Springs Road, addressed as 900 West Mission Avenue, Escondido, CA 92025, with Assessor's Parcel Numbers 228-220-43-00 and 228-220-13-00.
Use those statements only as notice-stated request and site context. This page does not state the current entitlement status, current project status, construction status, operations status, alcohol-sales status, traffic-signal status, parcel-boundary geometry, or private-property access status.
Planning Commission Process Context
The notice says the item would be heard directly by the City Council with no prior Planning Commission review and recommendation because the request was directly related to previous City Council action.
Use that as notice-stated process context only. Check later Council, planning, and project records before relying on procedural history, final action, appeal status, or legal effect.
Related local context
Reviewed pages that connect this item to nearby places, organizations, records, or topics.
Evidence and maintenance
References, source snapshots, and audit notes are kept here for readers who want to verify the page or maintain it later.
Good to know
Use this page as a sourced starting point for seeing what this source supports and which local pages connect to it.
- Check a current source before relying on final Council action, current entitlement status, current project status, construction, operations, alcohol-sales status, traffic-signal status,...
Change and source dates
- Latest page update
- 2026-06-03
- Latest source check
- 2026-05-26
- Source snapshot
- 2026-05-24T20:57:28-07:00
Later records should be checked before treating this source as final action, current status, or complete context.
References and audit trail
References
Publication Limits
This page does not publish final Council action, current entitlement status, current project status, construction status, operations status, alcohol-sales status, traffic-signal status, parcel-boundary geometry, private-property access guidance, appeal guidance, contact details, legal interpretation, or unattended claim writes.
Check agenda packets, staff reports, approved minutes, final resolutions, planning records, traffic-signal records, recorded documents, project-status records, and later official updates before relying on those claims.
